Monday, May 5, 2008

Book Reviews

I've recently had some time to read non-political science stuff (rejoice!).  Over the summer I am going to hold myself to the one book/week rule; that is, I am going to read one book a week, come hell or high water.  So if you have some recommendations of good books (fiction or non-fiction) - I'd like to hear them.  The next books on my list to read are:



Ori and Rom Brafman - Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior
John Vaillant - The Golden Spruce: A True Story of Myth, Madness, and Greed
(been wanting to read this forever since I actually saw the Golden Spruce before it was vandalized)
Phillip Pullman - His Dark Materials Trilogy (I "read" The Golden Compass as an audiobook on my iPod when I was out in Vegas for New Year's and would like to finish the rest of the trilogy)
 
Anyways, the four books I have read in the past few weeks are:



Tucker Max - I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
If you have an off-color sense of humor, I highly recommend this book.  And I don't just mean a little off color...I mean that I can pretty much guarantee that no matter who you are you will be offended by something in this book.  However, it is hilariously funny.  It is rare that a book makes me literally laugh out loud and this book had me cracking up in several spots.  Definite recommend if your mind is in the gutter like mine.



Bill Chen and Jarrod Ankenman - The Mathematics of Poker
This is a book that needed to be written.  I could not agree more with Chris Ferguson in his intro when he says that he has always told people that there are good game theory books and good poker books, but no good books on how the two relate.  This is that book.  I have only thoroughly read about 100 pages and skimmed through the rest, but this book is definitely recommended to anyone who wants to think about poker on a deeper level.  It's not really a strategy book, but more a way to change the way you think about the game.  It was helpful for me because it laid out some basic stats principles and game theory principles that I knew but was having difficulty thinking about how to apply them to poker.  I really like this book a lot, but I know probably the majority of people I know who like poker won't like this book.  Don't pick it up if you don't like math or strategy board games.  Otoh, if you like math, Chess, Diplomacy, or Scotland Yard (or any kind of strategy game) and you play poker, do yourself a favor and buy it.



Steve Berry - The Venetian Betrayal
I have read every single one of Steve Berry's books.  He was my Dan Brown replacement after I read all of Dan Brown's books (The DaVinci Code, Angels and Demons, Digital Fortress, etc.).  This book came out right before Christmas and I was really excited to see that Santa had put it under the tree for me.  However, I have to say I just don't like this book as much as some of his others.  It's not bad, but it just hasn't grabbed me the same way his other books did.  I could literally not put The Amber Room down once I started reading it and finished it in a day.  I had similar experiences with The Romanov Prophecy, The Templar Legacy, The Third Secret, and The Alexandria Link.  This book is certainly not bad, it just didn't grab me like the others.  It has all your favorite characters though (Cotton Malone, Cassiopeia Vitt, Henrik Thorvaldsen, Stephanie Nelle, etc.)  He's scheduled to come out with another one next December, so it will be interesting to see if that one is any better.  I don't think anyone has ever said that Steve Berry is an excellent writer, but he usually knows how to write a thriller (just like Dan Brown).  Alas, this book was just not that thrilling.  Maybe because they have already been developed in the other books, but I felt the characters were all pretty two dimensional as well. 



This book really had me wishing that Neal Stephenson would come out with another book already as I ripped through both Cryptonomicon, and all of the Baroque Cycle books (a combined ~4000 pages of novel) in the Summer of 2005  (when I was traveling for work nearly every week and therefore desperate for entertainment) like a junkie who needs to score another hit.  Since reading those books, I haven't found anything that comes even close to the genius of these books.  If you haven't read them, do yourself a favor and immediately proceed to your nearest bookstore.  Come to think of it, maybe I will re-read them.  They are some of the best (if not the best) fiction I have ever read.



James McManus - Positively 5th Street
A poker book that is non-fiction but not strategy and certainly not boring.  McManus is sent to Vegas to cover a murder trial and ends up playing in the WSOP Main Event.  I would recommend this book to anyone, not just people who know something about poker.  It is very well-written, entertaining, and he does a good job of explaining the poker world to people who don't know that much about it.  A movie is in the works.



Updated Fall 2008 schedule

Now that I've been assigned my TA-ship for the Fall, I have a better idea of my schedule.  Though I haven't technically changed my registration yet, I think I'm going to drop the Factor Analysis class I'm currently registered for and take another survey methods class instead.  It will probably be more useful to me in terms of my research and also that way I can make the case for more survey methods stuff on my quantitative methods second field comprehensive exam (which will make me stress less about it - especially if I end up taking it in January).



As you can see, sadly I do not have a very stacked schedule like I do this semester.  Only one true day off, though Monday and Wednesday only have 50 minute lectures for the class I am TA-ing.  I tend to be lazy on my day off and not get up til afternoon.  The fact that I will have to be up and on campus by 11 on Mondays and Wednesdays will force me to be productive, which is good.  I can sleep in on Thursdays.



Monday:


  • 11-11:50am GVPT 475 (lecture for class I am TAing) - The Presidency and the Executive Branch: Prerequisite: GVPT170 and GVPT241. Junior standing. For GVPT majors
    only.

    An examination of the U.S. presidency in historical and contemporary
    perspective: nomination and electoral politics and the president's
    place in policy-making, administration, and public opinion.







Tuesday:


  • 1:00-3:00pm office hours for GVPT 475 (this is determined by me, but right now this is probably the best place to put this).


  • 3:00-5:40pm SURV 632 - Social and Cognitive Foundations of Survey Measurement:
    Major sources of survey error-such as reporting errors and nonresponse
    bias-from the perspective of social and cognitive psychology and
    related disciplines. Topics: psychology of memory and its bearing on
    classical survey issues (e.g., underreporting and telescoping); models
    of language use and their implications for the interpretation and
    misinterpretation of survey questions; and studies of attitudes,
    attitude change, and their possible application to increasing response
    rates and improving the measurement of opinions. Theories and findings
    from the social and behavioral sciences will be explored.   



  • 6:30-9:30pm GVPT 743 - Contemporary political theory:
    Theorists from Nietzsche (1884-1900) to the present will be covered
    with a focus on the apparent failure of the Enlightenment to usher in
    an age of peace and reason.
     


     




Wednesday:


  • 11-11:50am GVPT 475 (lecture for class I am TAing)




Thursday:


  • nothing 




Friday:


  • 10-12:50pm GVPT 475 discussion sections

  • 1-4pm SURV630 -
    Questionnaire DesignThe stages of questionnaire design; developmental interviewing,
    question writing, question evaluation, pretesting, and questionnaire
    ordering and formatting. Reviews of the literature on questionnaire
    construction, the experimental literature on question effects, and
    the psychological literature on information processing. Examination of
    the diverse challenges posed by self versus proxy reporting and special
    attention is paid to the relationship between mode of administration and
    questionnaire design.


That's news to me

A few years ago, I researched and coauthored a report on state Medicaid plans (read it online here if you are so inclined).  Today I got an email from someone I used to work with asking me some questions about it that started with this:



"Dear Caity:

How are you?  I understand that you are returning to Abt.  Congratulations!"



I am?  That's news to me!



Some political humour

Hat tip to Melissa.





Beau Rivage review

The Beau poker room is really nice.  It's certainly the best poker room I've been to in terms of managers taking care of their players (both monetarily and otherwise).  The dealers were also top notch - I couldn't really pick out more than one dealer who was really having a hard time, and in most rooms there are several.  I also really liked the no cap buyins at NL games and playing with $100s.  It was really nice at the end of a session to be able to sell chips around the table and not have to go to the cage.



Negatives: not a lot of action (Travis will disagree with me here, but I was not playing $5/10).  I played 1/2, 2/5, 4/8 HOSE, and 2/5 PLO.  Plenty of action to be had at PLO and HOSE.  Not as much action at the 1/2 and 2/5 tables (compared to say, AC, or Foxwoods).  There were a few individual players who increased the action quotient at any given table, but on the whole most of the tables I played at were frustratingly tight (although tight weak), and even Saturday night at 1am, we were having trouble filling up our table.  There definitely was not your standard Friday/Saturday drunk crowd.  The best action was probably Friday early afternoon after people started busting out of their "big" $300 buyin tourney.  Whereas in AC/Vegas/Foxwoods, you can get people to bet your own hand for you, it was harder to get people to do that at the Beau in my experience.



Anyways, other than running bad, I really liked the poker room a lot and will definitely be trying to return in the future.



If you are wondering where I am this week...

I'm probably in the library.  Or in seclusion at home trying to finish up the two 20 page papers/presentations I have due next Monday.  The good news is that after Monday I will essentially be home free with only a takehome final and grading my students' finals after that.



Sunday, May 4, 2008

Definitely, Maybe

Saw this over the weekend and all I can say is that I wish all rom coms could be as good as this movie.  I loved the plot and it seemed fairly true to life (for a movie), not all sappy with a fake happy ending (e.g., Abigail Breslin's mom and dad are getting divorced and they don't end up getting back together at the end of the movie).  The acting was good, the writing was good...  all in all an underrated movie, methinks.



Netflix it when it comes out on dvd.